Drake Cooper
« Back to Blog

January 20th, 2012

State of the Media Democracy

image via

Deloitte just released their 6th State of the Media Democracy. The survey of 2,000 people (ages 14 – 75) focused primarily on the proliferation of devices: smartphones, tablets and DVRs. If you’re in need of up-to-date numbers the study is another good example about how access to content is increasing American media consumption.

Of key interest:

Smartphone penetration is now between 40 – 42%.

For tablet owners, 51% say they use their tablet in place of a laptop at home.

Of particular note, however, is that of DVRs. In this survey only 44% of people had DVRs as part of their current cable package. We thought that would be a larger number.

Find Deloitte’s State of the Media Democracy here.

November 16th, 2011

What If We Reversed The Order of Technology Adoption?

Most likely you own two connected devices. Actually, according to Forrester Research, one third of the US under the age of 50 owns three or more. And with each passing year these connected devices are growing in adoption and use. New devices are not necessarily forecast to replace each other but rather to add on to your technology portfolio. Which makes sense. For now, it’s hard to imagine creating a robust Excel spreadsheet on a tablet or phone.

So what are we doing with this technology? First we’re texting. Research says that most of us send between 500 – 800 texts per month with teens sending over 2,500 per month.

We are also reminded by the widely-respected Mary Meeker that we’re getting our music, our information, and our updates through the phone at an amazingly increasing rate:

It’s also very interesting to learn that 85% of the world’s population is now covered by commercial wireless signals, providing greater reach than the electrical grid, which rests at 80%.

Mobile is efficient.

But next time you’re at the airport, mall or other public place take note on how many people are using the phone versus how many people are on the phone.

On average wireless customers use 450 minutes per month, a decline of 77 minutes just two years ago. And if each text, call or email is counted as an “interaction” then 80% of interactions with our phone is non-voice related.

Furthermore, when we do talk on the phone these days we’re talking less. The average length of a phone call in 2008 was about two-and-a-half minutes. Today, it’s thought to be around 90 seconds.

Did we all of the sudden develop a resistance to speaking to other people?

Not really. (Although everyone can support and be thankful that we can communicate in multiple ways rather than just default to the telephone.)

What probably explains it best is something Clay Shirky wrote in Cognitive Surplus about technology adoption and age:

“1. everything that’s already in the world when you’re born is just normal;

2. anything that gets invented between then and before you turn thirty is incredibly exciting and creative and with any luck you can make a career out of it;

3. anything that gets invented after you’re thirty is against the natural order of things and the beginning of the end of civilisation as we know it until it’s been around for about ten years when it gradually turns out to be alright really.”

But what if the technology was reversed?

It’s helpful to think this way sometimes.When you do, perhaps it changes perception.

What if we started off with texting and data and online networking capabilities and then all of the sudden one day we could actually call people. We could talk to our friends as they we’re enjoying some far off land. We could hear them laugh on the other side of the country. We could catch up on old stories without having to type everything.

Anthony Tjan had a good post on HBR recently where he talked about how important it is to sometimes pick up the phone…

“The bigger need is for more live conversations to occur, period. This is especially true when people are trying to resolve a conflict or communicate an important business decision. There is a rising and unproductive trend towards people trying to do digital conflict resolution. The de facto path for issue resolution seems to be increasingly via email. More accurately, email has become a convenient mechanism for issue-avoidance.”

To help with this it’s important not to confuse media with interpersonal communication.

Our mobile devices are becoming more about media which, because that’s so cool, applies a hit on interpersonal communication, such as phone calls.

Back to Cognitive Surplus:

“Media is how you know when and where your friend’s birthday party is. Media is how you know what’s happening in Tehran, who’s in charge in Tegucigalpa, or the price of tea in China. Media is how you know why Kierkegaard disagreed with Hegel. Media is how you know when your next meeting is. Media is how you know about anything more than ten yards away.”

Our devices provide us both media and interpersonal communication abilities. But technology will continue to build the bicep of media much more than the tricep of interpersonal communication. So it’s up to us to keep the latter as strong as the former.

If cellular voice calling had just been invented I have a hunch we’d be talking more. Perhaps we might even avoid some issues, speed up decision making and get to know each other a little bit better.

 

[originally posted on Campaign Planning ]

March 25th, 2011

State of the Media Democracy

[ image ]

Deloitte recently released their “State of the Media Democracy” and the results are centering. It’s helpful to have one study that recaps everything from TV to Mobile to Web. Here’s the abridged :45 second version of some key findings for those on the go:

Television is still the most influential medium. 71% of Americans cite TV among their favorite media activities and 86% say it has the most impact on their buying decisions.

Okay then, but it’s important to note that while we’re watching TV, 75% of us are multi-tasking with 42% online while watching.

When it comes to smarphones, 33% of American households have one. This is up from 11% pre-recession.

When it comes to desktop computers, 85% of American homes now have one.

For magazines, 70% of us still enjoy reading them. And even though the same content is available online, 80% of Americans say they still prefer to read the printed editions. (A consistent figure since 2007.)

We like the cloud. 32% of us have the desire to have an online media storage service that is accessible from any device.

Finally, if given the choice to pay for online content at the expense of not being exposed to ads, only 26% of us would choose to do that.

Deloitte’s full report can be downloaded at the bottom of this page.

May 20th, 2010

Brands On The Go

If you’re going to read only one, 87 page deck this summer, might I suggest Morgan Stanley’s most recent Internet Trends? You can download or read it here. Mary Meeker, Scott Devitt and Liang Wu have put together a terrific presentation on the state of the internet. Well, actually, it’s the state of the mobile internet because, as you’ll soon read in their deck, that’s the game.

Couple of specific things to call out:

The amazingly fast growth of the mobile web vs. other leading online innovations:


How Social Networking has now passed email on both total users and time spent:

(And looking ahead at Social Networking, it may not just be about Facebook… It could also be about this.)

But here’s the slide that I think we should really focus on… at the end of 2013 the mobile web will surpass the desktop internet:


The marketing industry has been calling every year, ‘The Year of Mobile’ since 2005… but it’s finally upon us. With the hardware, software and user developments of today one can finally start to make sense not only about the present, but also the future, which, of course, is the only way to really attach ROI in this space.

But “mobile strategy” sounds so technical, dry and non-actionable. So I sometimes like to think of it instead as “Brands on the Go”.

Brands on the Go: What value does a brand serve up when a customer loads its mobile presence while traveling in the backseat of a car? While walking down the sidewalk? When standing at the point of sale of a competitor? Detached from their desktop–which, mind you, is not going away–what’s the value? A very important distinction and something that will be need to be thought about for all brands from here forward.

Anyway, check out Morgan Stanley’s Internet Trends when you get time. It’s chalked full of great stuff…

February 24th, 2010

Tweet Tweet!


In case you didn’t know Twitter has an analytics team. Part of their job is to measure and understand growth. This graph tells a story of how Twitter’s grown over the past three years in terms of number of tweets created per day. Note that tweets from accounts identified as spam have been removed so the counts in this chart do not include spam.

Tweeps were tweeting 5,000 times a day in 2007. By 2008, that number was 300,000, and by 2009 it had grown to 2.5 million per day. Tweets grew 1,400% last year to 35 million per day. Today, we are seeing 50 million tweets per day — that’s an average of 600 tweets per second.

This brings me to the question Ive been thinking about lately which is…Do people have lives anymore or are we all just drones stuck to computers and mobile devices?

May 26th, 2009

Print and Mobile Working Together

Influx drew my attention to Nokia’s new Point & Find (beta) that more closely links in-market print efforts with the mobile web. The video below articulates it best.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezct1VoRwUQ]

Along these lines, there’s been an increasing use of QR Codes on products and ads, which is another way of linking the physical world to the mobile web.

More popular in Japan and parts of Europe than in the US, QR Codes will gain steam here as increased consumer demand pulls device makers to include cameras and easy web browsing capabilities on all phones. But Ralph Lauren, among others, have already started including QR Codes on their ads:


What does it all mean?

With every day that passes the web is simply linking up tighter and tighter to the physical world. And the best description I’ve found so far of where this road probably leads is articulated here.