Drake Cooper
« Back to Blog

November 16th, 2011

What If We Reversed The Order of Technology Adoption?

Most likely you own two connected devices. Actually, according to Forrester Research, one third of the US under the age of 50 owns three or more. And with each passing year these connected devices are growing in adoption and use. New devices are not necessarily forecast to replace each other but rather to add on to your technology portfolio. Which makes sense. For now, it’s hard to imagine creating a robust Excel spreadsheet on a tablet or phone.

So what are we doing with this technology? First we’re texting. Research says that most of us send between 500 – 800 texts per month with teens sending over 2,500 per month.

We are also reminded by the widely-respected Mary Meeker that we’re getting our music, our information, and our updates through the phone at an amazingly increasing rate:

It’s also very interesting to learn that 85% of the world’s population is now covered by commercial wireless signals, providing greater reach than the electrical grid, which rests at 80%.

Mobile is efficient.

But next time you’re at the airport, mall or other public place take note on how many people are using the phone versus how many people are on the phone.

On average wireless customers use 450 minutes per month, a decline of 77 minutes just two years ago. And if each text, call or email is counted as an “interaction” then 80% of interactions with our phone is non-voice related.

Furthermore, when we do talk on the phone these days we’re talking less. The average length of a phone call in 2008 was about two-and-a-half minutes. Today, it’s thought to be around 90 seconds.

Did we all of the sudden develop a resistance to speaking to other people?

Not really. (Although everyone can support and be thankful that we can communicate in multiple ways rather than just default to the telephone.)

What probably explains it best is something Clay Shirky wrote in Cognitive Surplus about technology adoption and age:

“1. everything that’s already in the world when you’re born is just normal;

2. anything that gets invented between then and before you turn thirty is incredibly exciting and creative and with any luck you can make a career out of it;

3. anything that gets invented after you’re thirty is against the natural order of things and the beginning of the end of civilisation as we know it until it’s been around for about ten years when it gradually turns out to be alright really.”

But what if the technology was reversed?

It’s helpful to think this way sometimes.When you do, perhaps it changes perception.

What if we started off with texting and data and online networking capabilities and then all of the sudden one day we could actually call people. We could talk to our friends as they we’re enjoying some far off land. We could hear them laugh on the other side of the country. We could catch up on old stories without having to type everything.

Anthony Tjan had a good post on HBR recently where he talked about how important it is to sometimes pick up the phone…

“The bigger need is for more live conversations to occur, period. This is especially true when people are trying to resolve a conflict or communicate an important business decision. There is a rising and unproductive trend towards people trying to do digital conflict resolution. The de facto path for issue resolution seems to be increasingly via email. More accurately, email has become a convenient mechanism for issue-avoidance.”

To help with this it’s important not to confuse media with interpersonal communication.

Our mobile devices are becoming more about media which, because that’s so cool, applies a hit on interpersonal communication, such as phone calls.

Back to Cognitive Surplus:

“Media is how you know when and where your friend’s birthday party is. Media is how you know what’s happening in Tehran, who’s in charge in Tegucigalpa, or the price of tea in China. Media is how you know why Kierkegaard disagreed with Hegel. Media is how you know when your next meeting is. Media is how you know about anything more than ten yards away.”

Our devices provide us both media and interpersonal communication abilities. But technology will continue to build the bicep of media much more than the tricep of interpersonal communication. So it’s up to us to keep the latter as strong as the former.

If cellular voice calling had just been invented I have a hunch we’d be talking more. Perhaps we might even avoid some issues, speed up decision making and get to know each other a little bit better.

 

[originally posted on Campaign Planning ]

October 20th, 2011

Do You Need To Run An Ad Three Times?

Regardless of what you thought of this new Twinings Tea ad, do you need to see it two more times to understand it?

How about this? Need three times?

For decades there’s been a commonly-accepted industry rule that an ad needs to run three times in order for it to be effective on the viewer. Where did this come from and is it true?

Paul Feldwick, an exceptional brand planning thinker, recently wrote about this over at Warc. I’ll let you read it for yourself but basically the idea of “three frequency” started in the research department of GE in 1972. Their findings stated that the first ad impression allows the viewer to understand what it is, the second is to evaluate its relevancy and the third would be a true reminder.

Around the same time another study was published by the Marketing Science Institute that talked about how two ad exposures were needed for brand switching. This study was then basically combined with the GE study and in 1979 the Advertising Research Foundation published a paper solidifying a recommended frequency of 3x.

So we’ve had this three frequency idea for over 30 years and it’s worth a renewed look…

One Ad

First, before we immediately jump to the importance of three ads, what’s the value of just one ad?

Single-source panels (research sources that link buying behavior and advertising exposure) have shown repeatedly that in 45 – 50% of cases exposure to just one ad in a short period before buying increases the probability of buying that brand by a considerable degree. One ad, done well, does a lot of work without relying on the reinforcement of repeat exposure.

This points to the core purpose of advertising that Stephen King, the founder of Account Planning at JWT, called saleability. Yes, advertising can create sales immediately, but it also makes it so everything else–from packaging to pricing–has an easier job of selling.

But because of its linear structure, the frequency model infers that we can’t get something the first time. It presumes that we make all of our decisions in a very logical, processed, step-by-step manner.

Is this how we think? Someone tells us something so we know about it, then we’re told the same thing again so we can determine if it makes sense for us and then we’re reminded a third time so we can act. Do you need these three steps appropriately spaced out when discussing what you want for dinner tonight? Or accepting a friend’s recommendation on a movie?

But the 1972 GE research had to have a reason to say we made buying decisions like this. One possible answer: consider that in the early 70s if we saw an ad for something new, like Instant Breakfast, we didn’t have any options for more information. All we had was what an ad told us, what a friend said or our own eventual trial.

So we waited for information to arrive. Attitudes surrounding consumerism moved slower than they do today. And if a research project discussed ad exposure and purchase behavior it probably would have reflected this sentiment.

How We Communicate

We communicate with feeling and tone. It’s commonly estimated that between 60 – 95% of all communication is non verbal and it was the research of Paul Watzlawick that helped identify that it’s the tone (or metacommunication) that provides true meaning to words that are said. Effective communication doesn’t have much to do with the order and interval of spoken events… It has to do with the way things are said.

It’s emotion and feeling that motivates. As neurologist Donald Calne nicely stated:

“the essential difference between emotion and reason is that emotion leads to action while reason leads to conclusion”.

Howard Gossage once wrote that the buying of (advertising) time or space is not the taking out of a hunting license on someone else’s private preserve but is the renting of a stage on which we may perform.

This melds well with the idea of how things are said. Volume and repetition upon one person reaches diminishing returns quickly. The ad connects with them or it doesn’t and from there we’ll either have effective communication or non-communication.

Like this new ad from Deutsch. If you’re a gamer it connects on first viewing. If you’re not you could see it 1,000 times and still not have any idea what’s going on.

Distracted Viewers

But viewers are distracted. 40% of tablet and smartphone owners use them while watching TV. And with current adoption rates smartphones are approaching half of all mobile phones in the US. We are absorbing content on the go all the time. And when something connects we have instant access to take a next step. Danah Boyd articulated this perfectly:

“The goal is not to be a passive consumer of information or to simply tune in when the time is right, but rather to live in a world where information is everywhere. To be peripherally aware of information as it flows by, grabbing it at the right moment when it is most relevant and valuable, entertaining or insightful. Living with, in, and around information. Most of that information is social information, but some of it is entertainment information or news information or productive information.” 

So what are the odds that one single placement (or only one execution for that matter) is going to reach us and be relevant as we dash around our lives, zoning in and out of digital absorption in between things? We need multiple chips across the roulette board to hedge our odds of engaging someone correctly. This requires a diversified and nearly constant plan. Colleen DeCourcy referred to this type of thinking once as constant communications, which I rather like.

Perhaps it’s the word and meaning of frequency that should be challenged today. We don’t need to run an ad three times in order for one person to come to a decision. We need to create multiple opportunities for at least one relevant, emotion-forward, successful connection.

Or as a sentence in the original 1972 GE research report on frequency stated: “Like a product sitting on a shelf, you never know when the customer is going to be looking for you, so you must rent the shelf space all the time.”

 

[ originally posted on Campaign Planning ]

August 30th, 2011

The Age of the Customer

Forrester Research recently issued a terrific report called the Age of the Customer. I love the way the last 100 years are broken down: from manufacturing to distribution to information to the customer.


And while I find minor comedy in the fact that the ‘ages’ basically decrease by 50% at each stage thereby inferring that this latest age could last a mere 7 years or so I don’t want to dwell there. Because even if that’s the case, the amount of stuff we’ll get done and advance to in that time will probably be fairly amazing.

Anyway.

In thinking about the “Age of the Customer” and brands, consider some research insights from Bain:

- In most categories, strong customer loyalty brands grow twice as fast as the market.

- A 5% increase in customer retention can generate a 75% increase in profitablility.

- It typically costs 6 times more effort to get a new customer than to keep an existing one.

The age of the customer plays out well. So it’s helpful that earlier this year IBM issued a report that talked about the rise of Social CRM and I think it’s a great way to look at the evolution of social today within organizations.

It’s also nice that the pressure is off of marketing to be the sole champion of the possibilities of social within organizations…

So we’re all marketers now. Or, at least that’s the theory put forth by McKinsey who recently stated that in the era of engagement, marketing is the company.

Theory is great. We’re certainly not shy on theory as an industry. What we’re shy on is how—the actual application. Which is why I really liked how McKinsey broke that down into three general tactics that I think most organizations could immediately put to use:

1. Design a great customer engagement strategy and experience based on how people interact with the organization throughout their decision journey.

2. Build an infrastructure that achieves this and consider spreading out marketing teams to other divisions of the company such as service, sales and eCommerce.

3. Assign someone to be in charge of all digital conflict resolution within and across all functions in an organization. PepsiCo did this with the title of Chief Digital Officer.

So we are in the age of the customer. This requires us all to think and act a la Social CRM. And we execute that through design, build and assign.

For as complicated as this is I thought these three documents are extremely guiding. Please click on the links and explore as you like.

And, of course

[ originally posted on Campaign Planning ]

July 21st, 2011

How Great Creative Strategies Are Like Great Rock Bands

There are several levels of successful ideas in marketing, ranging from really good ideas to epic ideas. But how do you know if a creative strategy—and its subsequent marketing expression—might be one of those rare epic ideas? Perhaps a key question can help: Does the idea work at different emotional speeds? Can it emotionally upshift and downshift and still be on strategy?

Like this:

Upshift…

Downshift…

It’s a bit like people. There are times when we want energy and excitement, and then there are times that we welcome introspection and caring. If a brand stands for something huge, the same theory should apply. In Nike’s case, standing for “the athlete” is a huge position. It upshifts and downshifts but it’s always about the athlete. Because being an athlete carries a range of emotions. Harley-Davidson has done similar over time. Allstate is doing this now. The Gap did this when their advertising was part of culture.

We see this beyond advertising… we see it in rock bands. The epic groups are those capable of rocking a stadium, then immediately slowing things down, all the while still being, well, them. Consider: there’s “Pride (In the Name of Love)” and then “With or Without You.” “Revolution” and “Let It Be.” “Misty Mountain Hop” and “Going to California.” But no matter what track you’re listening to, it always feels perfectly normal and is unquestionably U2, The Beatles, and Zepplin through and through.

Most highly regarded marketing campaigns get a few great years of run time. But they need refreshing because the audience can start to wain and culture begins to shift, so we concept something new. Very normal. But I always have a fondness for emotional range. And the epic ideas are big enough to represent many different emotions all under one creative strategy, keeping the audience engaged for decades.

 

May 9th, 2011

Purpose Driven Marketing

It all starts at purpose driven marketing. What is the organization’s role in the world? What does it believe in? From that everything else falls… The way the product or service is produced. The way innovation is offered to customers. The way the organization gives back to the world. All these things tie up together.

So, if your organization ran the world, what would it do? Go ahead, be selfish for a moment… What is your organization better at than everyone else? What’s the purpose?

If you’re Cisco you would probably want everyone to make better human connections because that idea “changes the way we live, work, play and learn”. That’s Cisco’s purpose and it’s a terrific one with really no limits. Could a telecom company say this? Probably, but they wouldn’t be better at delivering on it than Cisco.

If you’re Nike you would probably want everyone to realize that “if you have a body you are an athlete”. That’s another amazing purpose. Could another athletic company say this? Perhaps, but I doubt they would be better at it than Nike.

Thinking about purposes like these really falls inline with the following quote from Dell’s most recent CMO, Erin Nelson, from an ANA convention on the subject…

“Purpose isn’t just good for the soul, it’s actually really good for the bottom line. The purpose can become the filter that says ‘do I or do I not invest the resources in getting this done, is it going to help me achieve the purpose for which my company exists every single day.”

Many call the idea of purpose driven marketing the future of advertising. We agree. Let’s think about it. And not just the giving back part of it, but the whole over-arching idea.

April 25th, 2011

North Of Center, No Chaser

Some brands are more than just the packaged product. A brand can evoke a place and even a state of mind. At this level, the creative process becomes more like an existential quest for meaning—a step beyond a simple logo and tagline.

When 44° North Vodka approached Drake Cooper for branding, marketing, and digital work, we quickly realized this brand raised more questions than answers. Questions like “What is Idaho about?” And even, “What is America all about?”

Part of the reason was 44° North Vodka’s origin as an independent, crafted vodka in a world of bland, mass produced spirits. Unlike most global vodka brands that are produced from neutral grain spirits, 44° North is Grown in Idaho and five column distilled, using Rocky Mountain Spring Water, Famous Idaho Potatoes (aka earth apples), Mountain Huckleberries, Rainier Cherries, and Brundage Winter Wheat.

While this sounds like a refreshing break from the mainstream, what does “Grown In Idaho” really mean? Outside of the Northwest and beyond the Famous Potato, Idaho is pretty much a blank slate. Upon further exploration, this turned out to be a good thing. People can make Idaho what they want to make of it, defining and redefining in the process. This notion is at the heart of the rugged independence of Idahoans. Coincidentally, this is the same DIY spirit that sparked 44° North’s early backpack revolution style of marketing and distribution.

This insight evolved into the North of Center brand direction. This tagline-and-more speaks to the indie mindset and the iconoclastic spirit of the Northwest. The brand identity evokes a rugged authenticity that is defiantly optimistic, wide-open and refreshingly direct.

The new brand allows 44° North to handle all avenues of communication in a unified approach, all the way from shelf-talkers to ads and from out-of-home to an engaging website complete with up-from-ordinary swag.

The results? 44° North is the number one vodka in Idaho and recognized by the Idaho Potato Commission and Idaho Preferred. Nationally, 44° North continues to gain distribution in many states, becoming the ambassador of North of Center—and all things Idaho.

As for the work, Drake Cooper recently won one Gold and two Silver Rockies at the 2011 IAF Rockie Awards. Gold for the 44° North brand materials and Silvers for the website and Distilled by Earth & Sky newspaper ad. Boo-ya.

Shout Out: Ken Wyatt, Ron Zier, Harold Joyce, Dylan Amundson, John Drake, Sean Young, Jennie Myers, Matt Stevens, Chad Connelly, Amanda Cash-Crowley, Chris Robinson of the PromoShop, and Scott Kelch.

March 25th, 2011

State of the Media Democracy

[ image ]

Deloitte recently released their “State of the Media Democracy” and the results are centering. It’s helpful to have one study that recaps everything from TV to Mobile to Web. Here’s the abridged :45 second version of some key findings for those on the go:

Television is still the most influential medium. 71% of Americans cite TV among their favorite media activities and 86% say it has the most impact on their buying decisions.

Okay then, but it’s important to note that while we’re watching TV, 75% of us are multi-tasking with 42% online while watching.

When it comes to smarphones, 33% of American households have one. This is up from 11% pre-recession.

When it comes to desktop computers, 85% of American homes now have one.

For magazines, 70% of us still enjoy reading them. And even though the same content is available online, 80% of Americans say they still prefer to read the printed editions. (A consistent figure since 2007.)

We like the cloud. 32% of us have the desire to have an online media storage service that is accessible from any device.

Finally, if given the choice to pay for online content at the expense of not being exposed to ads, only 26% of us would choose to do that.

Deloitte’s full report can be downloaded at the bottom of this page.

February 18th, 2011

The Earth, Air, and Water Upgrade

Big Bear Lake Resort Branding and Website

Big Bear Lake is Southern California’s only true four-season mountain resort, located 100 miles northeast of Los Angeles. The area has a seven mile long lake with fishing and water sports in the summer. It also has two full-service ski resorts in the winter—Snow Summit and Bear Mountain. The 200-member Resort Association, consisting of lodges, hotels, ski resorts, marinas and restaurants, enlisted Drake Cooper to help ramp-up marketing efforts to attract visitors to the Big Bear Lake region. This included not only a website redesign but a cohesive brand upgrade.

The new brand identity for Big Bear was launched under the thematic “Live It. Up.” This direction inspires and motivates outdoor enthusiasts to reap the benefits of an all-season escape out of SoCal city doldrums for some full-on fun.

For the brand, Drake Cooper created an identity scheme inspired by various National Forest trail signs at Big Bear Lake. The key elements of the logo include a newly revised “bear” icon, along with the brand designation “Mountain Lake Escape” which describes the heart of the brand.  A modular identity system was created which allows for versatility to change out the icon in the shield, to help communicate certain activities or marketing objectives.

The website was redesigned, shifting to a more member-focused functionality based around individual detail pages for each of the association members. Coupled with an SEO revamp, a custom-built, easy-to-use Content Management System (CMS) was developed so the members can easily update content, events, maps, alerts, banner ads, and much more.

The new brand identity and website launched mid-February to rave reviews from Big Bear Resort Association and site visitors.

See for yourself: www.bigbear.com

Shout-Outs: Bill Drake, Mona Teffeteller, Chad Connally, Josh Mcdannel, Justin Yonk, Heidy Agalsoff, Dennis Budell, Joe Quatrone, Amanda Cash-Crowley, Dave Casey, Joe Boren, Javier Barrera, and Gummibear.

January 10th, 2011

BEND KNEES WHEN LIFTING:: Brandbuilding for Bodybuilding.com

Bodybuilding is about results. At least that’s what all the trade pubs tell you with all the tanned and oiled hypertrophic muscle fetishizing going on. What’s lost is all the willpower, agony, and repetition that goes into transforming one’s body.

Bodybuilding.com approached Drake Cooper to help launch a key initiative through a national print campaign. A key challenge was to help grow Bodybuilding.com’s customer base without alienating its core audience, the competing bodybuilder.

Besides being the largest online sports nutrition company, Bodybuilding.com has really built its success by celebrating the bodybuilder. One aspect of this has been fostering a large, networked community called BodySpace on the site. Here, over 650,000 people connect, sharing workout tips and nutrition regimens. But it doesn’t stop there, the Bodybuilding.com site puts its people front and center by featuring their transformation stories online.

Spending some time reading the transformation stories, it becomes apparent that many Bodybuilders are everyday people overcoming amazing challenges to get into optimum health. It becomes clear that what is really transformed is not just the physical, but all aspects of life.

This motivation is what bodybuilders bring to the gym and when it comes right down to it, this willpower is found right there in every rep. It’s this insight that led to the brand idea of “LIFT LIFE.” This direction allowed the ad campaign to tap into and celebrate the LIFT LIFE, speaking to all audiences—from hardcore bodybuilders, gym junkies, athletes, active exercisers, and the emerging MMA crowd.

Little Black Dress

The LIFT LIFE gives voice to the willpower that says: “Lift, press, curl, pull until you can’t do one more rep. And then do one more rep. Half-hearted is half-crazy. Don’t show up, just to give up.”

Each ad features BodySpace and Bodybuilding.com bodybuilders in real-life environments. The stunning photography of Andy Anderson captured the LIFT LIFE story across all segments from compelling transformations to the competitive core crowd of bodybuilders.

Raising The Bar

The immediate feedback from the Bodybuilding.com community has been overwhelmingly positive and reconfirms the core purpose of the Bodybuilding.com brand—to inspire and celebrate everyone who lives the LIFT LIFE.

Look for the ads in major national publications like Shape, GQ, Men’s Fitness, Oxygen, Muscle & Fitness Hers, Flex, Playboy, UFC, and more. For more of the ads in the series, see Andy Anderson’s featured portfolio on LIFT LIFE.

Big Ups to our real-life, LIFT LIFE Models: Jamie Eason, Christina Vargas, Ashley Schutz, Sean Sarantos, Kizzito Ejam, Parker Cote.

Shout Out: Ryan DeLuca, Tanya Vaughan, Jennifer Hetherington, Andy Anderson, Michael Perez, Jennifer Diehl, Cindy Whitehead, Jennie Myers, Dylan Amundson, Sean Young, Karma Jones, Joe Quatrone, Dennis Budell.

December 10th, 2010

Web Media: Stock and Flow

2011 will be a year when social media becomes much more integrated with key business functions and many folks will find themselves managing an increased number of multiple accounts: from Facebook to HootSuite to Tumblr. So a common set of questions rolling into next year are: How do I best manage my various web media and my social media? Either personally or for my organization. Is there an over-arching strategy as to how I should act? Should I blog every day or should I blog once a week?  How active should I be in order to be ‘successful’?

Noah Brier at The Barbarian Group keeps a terrific blog. Recently, he had a great post which linked back to a thought that Robin Sloan over at Snarkmarket had made earlier this year. It talks about content creation in terms of a popular economics theory called, stock and flow.

From Robin:

“(In terms of economics) there are two kinds of quantities in the world. Stock is a static value: money in the bank, or trees in the forest. Flow is a rate of change: fifteen dollars an hour, or three-thousand toothpicks a day.

But I actually think stock and flow is the master metaphor for media today. Here’s what I mean:

Flow is the feed. It’s the posts and the tweets. It’s the stream of daily and sub-daily updates that remind people that you exist.

Stock is the durable stuff. It’s the content you produce that’s as interesting in two months (or two years) as it is today. It’s what people discover via search. It’s what spreads slowly but surely, building fans over time.”

I think that’s extremely centering.

A good strategy, as Noah and Robin both practice, is to put them together. Flow keeps you relevant and doesn’t make it so hard to draw attention to your stock once it’s ready. Keep yourself active. (It’s helpful to remember that 90% of the time any action from a tweet happens within the first hour of its post.) Then once you have stock, something of lasting value, you can easily plug that into your flow. Without good flow, whenever worthy stock becomes available people may not know the content is there and you have to re-establish your relevance–nearly impossible in a short time frame. All flow and no stock is pretty thin. And stock without flow may not achieve the results you want.

There is no universally correct method or frequency to produce your web media content. Blogs can serve as both stock and flow so it just depends on how you run them and what you’re comfortable with. The important thing is just to establish what your plan is to create both.

Thinking about media creation through the lenses of stock and flow is the best perspective I’ve heard in awhile and wanted to be sure to pass it along…