Drake Cooper
« Back to Blog

July 23rd, 2010

SEO Geeks, Meet Content Nerds. SMO and Search.

I’ve been hyped up on the concept of social media optimization since I listened to a webinar from Brian Solis in May.

I love that Google is now incorporating live results from channels like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube into its search returns. Not only does this up the ante for the importance of opinion leaders in these online spaces, it also challenges companies to become media producers instead of simply marketers.

While this feels like a basic concept, it’s still new too. I attended a Social Media Club meeting last night. Social Media Optimization was on the agenda for discussion. But the panel of really smart SEO gurus talked primarily about SEO. Not shocking.

Also not shocking was hearing the three savvy individuals reiterate that there’s no exact formula for enhancing SEO. One panelist offered a really great analogy. He said that SEO is a lot like life. “There’s no exact formula for leading a highly successful life, but a lot of highly successful people express the same traits and tips for conducting themselves.” Thus, there’s no exact formula for strong SEO, but follow the practices of industry leaders and you might get somewhere. 

The ambiguity still attached to SEO is exactly why I love the concept of SMO (not that it’s a completely clear concept either). While search engines’ algorithms for delivering results will probably remain forever unknown, I belive that social media optimization offers great opportunities for companies to start producing their own content and media. Ideally then, they can really engage with consumers and provide them with content that (should be) full of added-value. From there, they can listen to consumer response, monitor, gauge and engage, etc.

It gives those of us who love things like copywriting and content development the chance to play Content Nerd and hang in the same world as the SEO Geeks.

While I might stress for hours-on-end over what keywords to buy and which keywords to stuff my tags with, it doesn’t take me that long to jam-out a blog post, assign some keywords, post some pictures on Flickr and tag them with relevant keywords too. Tah-dah. And if the content is badass, well, all the better.

One thing I don’t understand yet is what type of content search engines give more weight….a website, blog, image, or video? Although Google’s new search options let the consumer choose what form of media they’re looking for. Which is sweet.

So “yay” for social media optimization and the opportunity it provides for companies to become media producers: create cool, useful, entertaining, informative content that your audience(s) will value and enjoy; do it often; apply appropriate keywords; presto.

Whether it’s that simple or not – I’m nerdishly excited to find out.

April 19th, 2010

Is traditional PR still effective?








That illustration is from Hugh Macleod of Gaping Void; follow him on Twitter @gapingvoid for a daily 140-character dose of enlightenment.

I love this illustration. It makes me think of sending a non-newsworthy press release to a journalist. Not that journalists are dinosaurs…seriously, I’m not trying to be snarky, although you could probably do a lot of funny things with that analogy. Although, you can create even more funny and deprecating analogies for PR kids, so we’ll just let it go….

The point is – I believe that journalists have grown increasingly tired of getting pitched for quite some time. True, most value getting an informative, newsworthy, highly relevant lead. But – here’s the vicious cycle that’s developed that, I believe, makes journalists feel like they’re getting bombarded with ‘meteors’:

1. Every single business believes they deserve publicity. Thus, they demand it.

2. Every PR kid is willing to flush out hundreds of pitches and/or press releases to journalists, regardless of whether the information they’re shucking is, again, newsworthy or relevant to the journalist and said journalist’s readers/advertisers. (And don’t act like the advertisers don’t influence editorial…they do and they should. It’s called capitalism and it’s okay. Call me an idealist, but I believe objective reporting on hard news and capitalism-influenced features can someday find a fabulous balance in media.)

3. Journalists get bombarded with content that ranges from complete crap, to decent ideas for stories, to good ideas for stories from relatively unknown sources, to decent ideas for stories from well-known, big-name sources.

4. A good number of journalists ignore a vast majority of the pitches they receive. And rightly so – how on earth could they sift through all the ground noise?

I don’t believe that the result lies in writing better pitches or pitching more often – that just adds to the ground noise and exacerbates the problem.

Instead, I believe PR kids have to assess what exactly their role, strategy, and tactics should be for communicating with an organization’s publics.

The Internet, obviously, informs and changes a PR kid’s role, strategy, and tactics. It offers many different channels through which to communicate with many different publics.

Yet companies still, and will likely always, want traditional print coverage.

Rightly so – but I believe it’s the PR kids’ responsibilities to:

1. Redefine their roles. PR needs to go ‘back to basics’ and consider all the ways they can communicate and engage with as many ‘publics’ as possible. And while online communication and community management is an obvious and exciting trend that I’m obsessed with right now, PR practitioners shouldn’t underestimate the value of a good time, in real time. Events offer people real experiences that they can Twitter about or post pictures of on Facebook, carrying positive momentum online. It’s a magical thing – and events are kickass.

2. Have patience with the shifting landscape. Redefining the role(s) of public relations is going to take time. I’m down with that though, because I think the result is going to be something closer to what ‘public relations’ intended.
“What is public relations?”
“Consider all of your company’s publics: their customers; their employees; their employees’ families; their shareholders; their potential customers; media who report on what they do/sell. Consider their needs, wants, values, passions, gripes, desires, and communicate with them. Engage them. Be a resource for all of those things.”

Public relations is a process and not a pitch, so having patience with the shifting roles should be inherent for the practitioner who really digs what he/she does.

3. Educate. At the end of the day, the direction from the C-Office might be “I want to see more pitches.” That’s something every PR kid faces.
On the one hand, you want to keep your job/respect the C-Office. On the other hand, you know that “another pitch” may not be the best use of your time. What to do?

a. Experiment with things like online community management.
b. Try to produce as many social media objects as possible and then practice social media optimization.
c. MEASURE THESE EFFORTS. Whether qualitatively or quantitatively – preferably both. Keep an eye on what works and what doesn’t; record what works and change what doesn’t.
d. Share qualitative and quantitative insights with what works with your client.
e. Suck it up and send out the relevant/newsworthy press release. But post it online too, and optimize it for search.
f. Come up with a event that showcases your client’s brand/service/image and will give the client’s public(s) a kickass good time. Plan it out in great detail and present it. If the client says “no,” that’s okay. Tuck it away and present it next time: someone will see the light and help you burn down the box.

I’d really like to hear from journalists and PR kids alike as to what they think about the (which I believe is outdated) PR role of “sell the message and get the press.”

Traditional PR may still be effective – but it’s certainly no longer enough to just pitch the day away.

“It wastes your time. And it annoys the dinosaur.”

February 19th, 2010

Crisis Management 101: Tiger Woods

Tiger Woods just issued his first public appearance and public apology since the truth about his infidelity and affinity for porn-stars exploded via media.

Read the transcript of his public apology here.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q349YczkqFk]

A few points from Crisis/Reputation Management 101 that Woods seems to have been coached on:
1. If everyone knows you’re at fault, say you’re sorry.
Woods’ first item of business today was to clearly say “I’m sorry.” He addresses his primary publics (his wife, his kids, his family, his fans, his business partners, etc.) and issues a clear apology for how his actions impacted them.

2. Acknowledge you are like everyone else.
Woods admits that he doesn’t “get to play by different rules.” In effect, he is like everyone else. I.E. He has made mistakes like everyone else and he has to pay for them like everyone else. This is a good tactic in that it makes the rest of us imperfect souls consider our mistakes and realize that Tiger Woods, after all, is only human. He has to play by the same ‘rules’ as we do but at the same time, he is as imperfect as the rest of us.

3. Assurance that improvements have begun.
Tiger talks about his 45 days of inpatient therapy. This assures his publics that he’s already taken steps to fix the problems he has caused. He alludes to intentions for ongoing improvements. “I have a long way to go. But I have taken my first steps in the right direction.

4. Rumor control.
Woods does address rumor in a relatively ambiguous manner. “Some people have made things up that never happened.” Then he goes on to refer to the rumor of performance-enhancing drugs, but doesn’t allude to any of the outlandish stories of infidelity. It’s good that he doesn’t elaborate on this point, but instead leaves the issue hanging in peoples’ minds as to which stories were rumors and which were truths. It’s doubtful this will stifle media speculation, but that may not matter.

So, what are your thoughts/feelings/reactions from Tiger Woods’ public apology?

Was it enough? A good step in the right direction? Were his actions simply unforgivable? Was he practicing good PR in doing this press conference? Anyone know who his publicist or PR agent is?

We have our own individual opinions here at Drake Cooper. But we’d really love to know yours.

February 10th, 2010

Toyota’s Media-Generated Crisis; Post-Crisis Communication

Whether you drive a Toyota Prius or have just been following the media waylay Toyota has received over the issue of the Prius’s faulty breaks, it’s been fascinating to see media and even D.C. politicos inform the extent of this crisis and Toyota’s response – lacking or not.

Academic approaches to crisis communications (read – great scholars like Coombs, Holladay, & Ulmer) often look at the extent to which media actually inform and manifest a crisis.

For Toyota and the case of the faulty breaks and sticky gas pedals, staunch media coverage and the whole “stop driving your Toyota’s” misstatement from transportation secretary LaHood, definitely seem to be manifesting a crisis that never actually happened.

I say the crisis “never actually happened” because, well, it’s not like millions of Prius drivers’ breaks all suddenly failed at once and a bunch of people perished. (For a more appropriate definition of a crisis, see Haiti).

Now – should faulty break and sticky gas pedal malfunctions have been addressed? Absolutely? Should Toyota have responded with recalls sooner? Probably. But the recalls are out – to the tune of 8.5 million cars and trucks, globally.

Toyota has produced (quite quickly, I might add) some television spots like this one, which practice crisis management 101: remind audience of long-established, trusted history; softly acknowledge faults; point out efforts to fix errors; talk about bright and promising future.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZoBfpm1zHg]


I actually think the messaging in this video is solid – straightforward – and affective. Granted, I don’t drive a Toyota. So for those that do, are Toyota’s actions sufficient in easing consumers’ fears?

Or do additional media reports about an inaccessible brand and closed company culture carry more weight and implications than a 15-second TV spot with reassuring messaging can fix?

Ironically, companies with closed cultures and their ability to survive crises is also an oft-studied topic when it comes to crisis communication.

And the basic premise of many theories resulting from these studies?
If you have a tight-lipped, inaccessible corporate culture and you or your product encounters risk or an actual crisis, media are going to attack you corporate practices right along with the risk/crisis.

Which is to say, media-generated crisis or not, it’s still a crisis.
And I believe it takes a lot more (read corporate culture overhaul) than a creative commercial spot to make the crisis subside.

February 8th, 2010

Is partnering with the NSA a bad move for Google?

Wired Magazine published this article, titled ‘Don’t Be Evil,’ Meet ‘Spy on Everyone’:How the NSA Deal Could Kill Google.

Anyone (read everyone) who uses or has used Google or any Google applications should read it and keep an eye on how Google is monitoring and processing or sharing your information.

I’ll leave the conspiracy theory blotheating about the impact of this Google-NSA partnership for my personal blog.

Personal rights to privacy aside, it is interesting to consider how this partnership with the NSA might impact Google from an economic standpoint.

As its mantra “Don’t Be Evil” diminishes in meaning, will the masses start looking to search engines like Bing for answers, applications and advertising?

Or, are Google’s programs so widely used, and the Google brand so predominant, that the company can create partnerships with the likes of the NSA without suffering a PR debacle?

The answers will develop over time on this one. But for those interested in everything from rights to privacy to SEM, the Google-NSA relationship might be a good one to follow.

September 9th, 2009

ADWEAK



http://twitter.com/adweak




June 1st, 2009

Arnold Aviation story featured in the New York Times

Ray Arnold at the helm, flying over
the Middle Fork of the Salmon River

It’s always considered to be quite a coup for a public relations professional to place a story in The New York Times.

We started working on a story for Arnold Aviation in Cascade, Idaho, in early April when the U.S. Postal Service announced that it was going to terminate the air taxi’s $46,000 annual contract as of the end of June.

I sent out a news release about this unfortunate turn of events, and it launched a great deal of media coverage in Idaho and the Pacific Northwest in no time at all. I wrote the news release much like I would have written the story for the New York Times when I wrote for them on a regular basis as a freelancer in the 1990s, and it found plenty of traction.

The story in the Saturday issue of the New York Times was well-done. It includes a slide show of some beautiful pictures of the Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness and the sea of mountains in Central Idaho.

Happily, this story had a good ending after many people complained, and Idaho’s congressional delegation put the pressure on the Postal Service to retain Arnold’s contract. Sometimes, the system works. – SS

May 4th, 2009

Joanne Taylor featured in the Idaho Business Review

It’s no secret that around here we view our own Joanne Taylor (and her twenty-five years of public relations experience) as something of a PR Goddess. So when the Idaho Business Review wrote an article about Joanne and her advice on crises management, we weren’t surprised. Joanne offers thoughtful insight to IBR writer, Dani Grigg, and discusses what she did when a client’s 200 ft sign literally came crashing to the ground right after she and her team promoted the construction of the world’s largest sign.
To read the full article, click here.

January 14th, 2009

PR guru Joanne Taylor to lead Idaho’s PRSA

As reported in the Idaho Statesman this week. Congratulations Joanne!

Idaho’s chapter of the Public Relations Society of America has announced its slate of officers for 2009. The chapter will be led by president Joanne Taylor, director of public relations and social media strategy at Drake Cooper, a Boise-based marketing communications agency. Taylor has more than 20 years of experience in public relations management, having led PR efforts for three publicly traded companies and several clients at Drake Cooper. She has served on the PRSA Idaho Board of Directors since 2005 and is an adjunct professor at Boise State University.

Here’s a link to the story in the Statesman.

You can also find Joanne on Twitter and befriend her on Facebook.

December 15th, 2008

National media give advice on Twitter

Courtesy of a PRSA teleconference, four members of the national news media weighed in about Twitter. The panelists ranged from a technology reporter from the St. Paul Pioneer Press, a business columnist for the San Jose Mercury News, and the digital audio manager for ABC News. About 10 PRSA members from Boise came over to Drake Cooper agency to participate in the discussion.

A blogger once described Twitter as “the latest Silicon Valley play thing” or “instant messaging for adults.” Approximately 4 million people are using it now, a 440 percent increase from this time last year. Between 250,000 to 500,000 new people are jumping on board each month. This compares to 41 million unique visitors who frequent Facebook per month. Twitter is growing, but it’s certainly not the only social media tool out there. Even so, because million of people are using it, it has become a marketing tool, it’s a great way to pass on information to your friends and associates, it’s being used by journalists to find sources for stories, and it’s being used by PR people to pitch stories to journalists.

So, Twitter is another conduit that PR people can use to reach journalists who may have blocked their email inbox from unsolicited queries. How do we find these folks through Twitter? There are several lists out there online. Click here to see a pretty inclusive list of twittering journalists. This is great intelligence for the PR professional.

BUT … the journalists on the panel warned us that sending them a story pitch via Twitter may not be the best way to pitch a story. Some of them prefer to receive a pitch via email, and some of them suggest getting to know them first by following them on Twitter, and then pitching them later.

They also reminded us that the same rules apply for pitching stories to them:

1. Research their bio and know what topics they cover.
2. Research the media outlet they work for and make sure they haven’t already covered that story.
3. Get to the point quickly.

On the last point, Twitter requires you to be succinct because a “tweet” can not exceed 140 characters. Some journalists in the high-tech field prefer to be pitched on Twitter so they don’t have to wade through a lengthy email to find the crux of the story pitch, if one exists at all.

The journalists also suggested hooking up with them via Facebook. The techie reporter for the St. Paul paper said he loves Twitter and hates Facebook. He also just finished a book about Twitter titled, “Twitter Means Business: How Microblogging Can Help or Hurt Your Company.”

The other journalists on the panel liked Facebook, and see that service providing a lot more information and bells and whistles than Twitter.

Ultimately, we should know that Twitter is a unique social media tool, and it should be used accordingly. Figure out your goals, and use whatever communication tools are best suited to reach your goal. None of the tools are the end-all be-all by themselves.

But as new tools emerge, the Drake Cooper PR team believes that it is prudent to learn more about them and know how to use them.

A couple of Twitter resources: